Skip to main content
· 11/22/1989

United States v. Miguel Nunez (88-2089) and Ernesto Rodriguez (88-2090)

Citations

  • 889 F.2d 1564
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 17531
  • 1989 WL 140119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversible error on de novo review where district court provided no response to jury question about status of agreement with specific agent other than repeating general instructions that did not address topic

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Wellford, Lively

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.