Skip to main content

Eubanks v. State

Citations

  • 419 So. 2d 1330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that testimony describing the warrant for the accused's arrest was admissible because it showed the officer was acting within his authority and was substantially necessary to present a complete story to the jury
  • holding that testimony describing the warrant for the accused's arrest was admissible because it showed the officer was acting within his authority and was substantially necessary to present a complete story to the jury
  • proof of a crime distinct from that alleged in the indictment should not be admitted into evidence against the accused
  • proof of a crime distinct from that alleged in the indictment should not be admitted into evidence against the accused
  • proof of a crime distinct from that alleged in the indictment should not be admitted into evidence against the accused

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patterson, C.J., and Roy Noble Lee and Prather

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.