Estes v. Hancock County Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• generally, proper remedy is to “overcome the jury’s anomalous verdict by granting a new trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Southern Management Corp. v. Taha
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-11-25· cited 80×
• Margarita Rivera De Feliciano, Etc. v. Francisco De Jesus, Etc., Farm Credit Corporation
  First Circuit· 1989-05-24· cited 43×
• Hendrickson & Sons Motor Co. v. OSHA
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1975-07-30· cited 41×
• Crosson v. Berry
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-06-15· cited 38×
• State v. Hall
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1982-03-22· cited 21×
• Sandock v. Taylor Construction Corp.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1981-02-25· cited 9×
• American Turners of South Bend, Indiana & Associated Realty Corp. v. Rodefer
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1978-02-16· cited 8×
• Hanas v. Rasmussen
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1985-10-23· cited 6×
• Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. Stock
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1980-05-13· cited 4×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Phar-Crest Land Corp. v. Therber
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1969-02-27· cited 35×
• Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. Henby
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1912-02-02· cited 32×
• Lytton v. Baird
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1884-01-24· cited 29×
• Southport Board of Zoning Appeals v. Southside Ready Mix Concrete, Inc.
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1961-06-28· cited 24×
• Stivers v. Old National Bank
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1970-12-09· cited 14×
• Anderson v. Kinser
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1961-04-11· cited 5×
• KIRKUM v. Kasprzak
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1961-10-24· cited 3×
• Barrett v. Schmidt
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1963-04-15· cited 3×
• Hoefler & Stoecklein Co. v. Pioneer Buildings of Ohio, Inc.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 1950-03-28· cited 2×