Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 4/4/1887

Estes v. Gunter

Citations

  • 121 U.S. 183
  • 7 S. Ct. 854
  • 30 L. Ed. 884
  • 1887 U.S. LEXIS 2036

Syllabus

<p>G being embarrassed, assigned his property, amounting in value to more than $5000, to S for the benefit of his creditors, with preferences in favor of E to the amount of $10,000. B, an uupr.eferred creditor, sued out a writ of attachment for $3000, which was followed by similar writs on behalf of other creditors. E filed a bill in equity against G and S and B, • and other attaching' creditors, to enjoin a sale under the attachments and to have the assignment declared valid; but during the progress of the suit dismissed the suit as to the other attaching creditors. The bill was dismissed on the ground that the assignment was made to hinder and delay creditors. E appealed to this court. On a motion to dismiss on the ground that the claim of B was not sufficient to give this court jurisdiction: Held, that the court had jurisdiction, the suit being brought not simply to defeat B’s attachment, but to establish the assignment. and make it available for E’s benefit.</p>

Judges: Waite

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.