Kentucky Supreme Court· 1/17/2002
Estep v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 64 S.W.3d 805
- 2002 Ky. LEXIS 5
- 2002 WL 63548
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he Due Process Clause is implicated only when the failure to preserve ... evidence was intentional and the potential exculpatory nature of the evidence was apparent at the time it was lost or destroyed.”
- \[T]he Due Process Clause is implicated only when the failure to preserve ... evidence was intentional and the potential exculpatory nature of the evidence was apparent at the time it was lost or destroyed.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cooper, Lambert, Graves, Johnstone, Keller, Stumbo, Wintersheimer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- St. Clair v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2004-02-23· cited 102×
- Swan v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2012-08-23· cited 72×
- St. Clair v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2014-08-21· cited 61×
- Roark v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2002-09-26· cited 51×
- Goncalves v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2013-02-21· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. KeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-07-20· cited 44×
- Grady v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2010-11-18· cited 36×
- University Medical Center, Inc. v. BeglinKentucky Supreme Court· 2011-10-27· cited 35×
- Mills v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2005-05-19· cited 33×
- Ragland v. Estate of DigiuroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2010-10-22· cited 29×
- Coulthard v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2007-08-23· cited 28×
- Fields v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2008-10-23· cited 26×
- Hilbert v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2005-05-19· cited 26×
- Greene v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2008-01-04· cited 23×
- Brooks v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2007-11-09· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. FarmerKentucky Supreme Court· 2014-02-20· cited 19×
- Anthony Haire v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2017-05-08· cited 14×
- Peak v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2006-08-24· cited 12×
- White v. Com. of Ky.Missouri Court of Appeals· 2017-08-24· cited 10×
- Farmer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2009-09-04· cited 1×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
- South Carolina v. KatzenbachSupreme Court· 1966-05-02· cited 945×
- Sanborn v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1988-06-09· cited 228×
- Slaven v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1997-12-18· cited 94×
- Collins v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1997-09-04· cited 74×
- State v. YoungbloodArizona Supreme Court· 1993-01-07· cited 70×
- Elliott v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1998-09-03· cited 70×
- Tamme v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1988-09-08· cited 57×
- Commonwealth v. HagerKentucky Supreme Court· 2001-01-25· cited 56×
- Sherley v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1994-12-22· cited 52×
- Shannon v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1988-12-15· cited 48×
- Brown v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1977-07-01· cited 47×
- Williamson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1989-04-06· cited 47×
- Grimes v. McAnultyKentucky Supreme Court· 1997-10-02· cited 41×
- Jones v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1992-04-30· cited 30×
- Tinsley v. JacksonKentucky Supreme Court· 1989-06-08· cited 24×
- Pace v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1978-01-31· cited 21×
- Johnson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1994-11-23· cited 17×
- Ward v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1956-02-24· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.