Estep v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the introduction of a photograph of the defendant in handcuffs at the time of his arrest was not reversible error
• affirming when photograph of defendant handcuffed at time of arrest was admitted and jury was admonished that handcuffs had no significance
• affirming when photograph of defendant handcuffed at time of arrest was admitted and jury was admonished that handcuffs had no significance
• following United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 102 S.Ct. 2157, 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982), in upholding the search of a lawfully stopped automobile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).