Skip to main content

Espinoza v. State

Citations

  • 185 S.W.3d 1
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 8202
  • 2005 WL 2438313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that appellant was not in custody where appellant: (1) voluntarily accompanied a detective to the police station to give a statement; (2) was never placed under arrest or in handcuffs; (3) walked freely in the hallways of the station; (4
  • concluding that appellant was not in custody where appellant: (1) voluntarily accompanied a detective to the police station to give a statement; (2) was never placed under arrest or in handcuffs; (3) walked freely in the hallways of the station; (4
  • holding defendant was not in custody when she went to police station and waited for two hours on her on volition, was repeatedly told she could leave, was permitted to use the restroom whenever she wanted, and was permitted to leave at the end of the interview
  • holding defendant was not in custody when she went to police station and waited for two hours on her on volition, was repeatedly told she could leave, was permitted to use the restroom whenever she wanted, and was permitted to leave at the end of the interview

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone, Duncan, Angelini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.