Escamilla v. cuello/cabrera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting a statutory interpretation that is “most plausible and harmonious”
• adopting a statutory interpretation that is “most plausible and harmonious”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cornerstone Hospital of Southeast Arizona v. Ernest H. Blackburn
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-12-07· cited 17×
• Glover v. Glover
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-11-13· cited 16×
• Arellano v. Primerica Life Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-08-12· cited 12×
• Vanoss v. BHP Copper Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-01-08
• State v. foothills/hanke
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2025-01-28
• Jamie Clem v. Pinal County, Pinal County Sheriff Mark Lamb
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2025-10-30

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bullock v. Carter
  Supreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 1,313×
• Clements v. Fashing
  Supreme Court· 1982-09-09· cited 772×
• Sugarman v. Dougall
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 451×
• Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & Young
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1996-05-07· cited 147×
• Ruiz v. Hull
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1998-04-28· cited 81×
• Brousseau v. Fitzgerald
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-01-05· cited 44×
• Ballesteros v. American Standard Insurance
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2011-01-20· cited 42×
• Gladden Farms, Inc. v. State
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 34×
• Bysiewicz v. Dinardo
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-05-18· cited 30×
• Triano v. Massion
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-09-04· cited 15×
• McCarthy v. State Ex Rel. Harless
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1940-04-22· cited 14×
• Mandraes v. Hungerford
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-01-09· cited 13×
• Shirley v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR COUNTY OF APACHE
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-09-07· cited 12×
• Bee v. Day
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2008-08-22· cited 10×
• Municipality of Anchorage v. Mjos
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2008-03-27· cited 2×