Skip to main content
· 8/22/2008

Bee v. Day

Citations

  • 189 P.3d 1078
  • 218 Ariz. 505
  • 537 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 14
  • 2008 Ariz. LEXIS 142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the omission of the expiration date of the candidate’s unexpired vacant term was not fatal because only one seat for that office was open in that election
  • failure to specify candidate was running for a partial term was not confusing when only the partial term would be on the ballot
  • “In reviewing non-compliance with any component of the form, the relevant inquiry is whether the form as a whole substantially complies with the statutory requirements.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bales, Berch, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.