Ernesto Galarza v. Mark Szalczyk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[a]ll Courts of Appeals to have commented on the character of ICE detainers refer to them as ‘requests’ or as part of an ‘informal procedure’”
• holding in 2-1 decision that “detainers are not mandatory,” but must be considered “requests”
• construing 8 CFR section 287.7(d) as merely a request, and noting potential constitutional and statutory infirmities if interpreted as mandatory
• involving a U.S. citizen arrested on unrelated state criminal charges but held after posting bail pursuant to an immigration detainer
• involving a U.S. citizen arrested on unrelated state criminal charges but held after posting bail pursuant to an immigration detainer
• reviewing the INA and ICE’s position on detainers to conclude that “detainers are not mandatory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Ernesto Galarza v. Mark Szalczyk

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Ernesto Galarza v. Mark Szalczyk
  Third Circuit· 2014-03-26
• Ernesto Galarza v. Mark Szalczyk
  Third Circuit· 2014-04-16