United States v. Uribe-Rios

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, even if constructive knowledge of defendant's illegal presence triggered statute of limitations for § 1326, government lacked constructive knowledge
• defining detainers as a “request that another law enforcement agency temporarily detain an alien” to permit immigration officials to assume custody (citing 8 C.F.R. § 287.7)
• discussing nature of § 1326 as a continuing offense in statute of limitations context
• “The Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial does not attach until indictment or arrest.”
• “[B]ecause there is no right to serve state and federal sentences concurrently, an appellant’s lost chance of doing so cannot be used to establish prejudice for the purposes of challenging pre-indictment delay.”
• “[B]ecause there is no right to serve state and federal sentences concurrently, an appellant’s lost chance of doing so cannot be used to establish prejudice for the purposes of challenging pre-indictment delay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).