Skip to main content

Eriksen v. Mobay Corp.

Citations

  • 110 Wash. App. 332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • design defect claim based on consumer expectations theory preempted by FIFRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kurtz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Eriksen v. Mobay Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.