· 3/27/1998
Reece v. Good Samaritan Hospital
Citations
- 953 P.2d 117
- 90 Wash. App. 574
- 1998 Wash. App. LEXIS 448
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the consumer expectation test could not be met where the manufacturer had \adequately warned consumers of the risks associated with using a product\
- finding that the consumer expectation test could not be met where the manufacturer had “adequately warned consumers of the risks associated with using a product”
- affirming grant of summary judgment on express warranty claim where plaintiff \introduced no evidence that she relied on the alleged express warranty\
- breach of express warranty claim legally insufficient where there was “no evidence that [the plaintiff] relied on the alleged express warranty”
- design defect claim based on consumer expectations test preempted
- design defect claim based on consumer expectations test preempted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.