Skip to main content
· 3/27/1998

Reece v. Good Samaritan Hospital

Citations

  • 953 P.2d 117
  • 90 Wash. App. 574
  • 1998 Wash. App. LEXIS 448

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the consumer expectation test could not be met where the manufacturer had \adequately warned consumers of the risks associated with using a product\
  • finding that the consumer expectation test could not be met where the manufacturer had “adequately warned consumers of the risks associated with using a product”
  • affirming grant of summary judgment on express warranty claim where plaintiff \introduced no evidence that she relied on the alleged express warranty\
  • breach of express warranty claim legally insufficient where there was “no evidence that [the plaintiff] relied on the alleged express warranty”
  • design defect claim based on consumer expectations test preempted
  • design defect claim based on consumer expectations test preempted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.