Erickson v. Sentry Life Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “By applying the law of the state where the master policy was delivered, ‘everywhere it shall have the same meaning and give the same protection and that inequalities and confusion liable to result from applications of diverse state laws’ would be avoided.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rice v. Dow Chemical Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-07-07· cited 122×
• Karpenski v. American General Life Companies, LLC
  W.D. Washington· 2014-04-02· cited 23×
• Karpenski v. American General Life Companies, LLC
  W.D. Washington· 2014-02-14· cited 14×
• Flaaen v. Principal Life Insurance Co.
  W.D. Washington· 2016-12-22· cited 1×
• Estate of Meredith L. Sullivan
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2021-02-22

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Boseman v. Connecticut General Life Insurance
  Supreme Court· 1937-04-26· cited 191×
• Simms v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1984-08-02· cited 60×
• Miller v. Home Insurance Co.
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1980-09-09· cited 27×
• Wood v. New York Life Insurance
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1985-12-04· cited 24×
• Erdman v. Lower Yakima Valley B.P.O.E. Lodge No. 2112
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-07-18· cited 20×
• Employees Service Ass'n v. Grady
  California Court of Appeal· 1966-08-04· cited 6×
• Continental Casualty Company v. Jessie Giddings Thompson
  Ninth Circuit· 1966-11-21· cited 5×