EQUIVEST LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. Brooms

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \We ... feel constrained to\ require strict compliance with tax sale notice provisions, \even if doing so produces anomalous results.\
• “[w]e ... feel constrained to” require strict compliance with tax sale notice provisions, “even if doing so produces anomalous results”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Burkhardt v. Bailey
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2004-05-14· cited 242×
• Detroit Leasing Co. v. City of Detroit
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2006-03-02· cited 42×
• Amos v. Aspen Alps 123, LLC
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2012-06-18· cited 30×
• Amos v. Aspen Alps 123, LLC
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2010-01-07· cited 6×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ardt v. Titan Insurance
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1999-04-21· cited 118×
• Haworth, Inc. v. Wickes Manufacturing Co.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-04-21· cited 42×
• Indenbaum v. Michigan Board of Medicine
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-09-08· cited 25×
• Brandon Township v. Tomkow
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-06-02· cited 15×
• Andre v. Fink
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1989-10-02· cited 10×
• Ottaco, Inc. v. Kalport Development Co., Inc.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2000-03-22· cited 4×
• Stein v. Hemminger
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1988-01-19· cited 4×