Skip to main content
· 3/2/2006

Detroit Leasing Co. v. City of Detroit

Citations

  • 713 N.W.2d 269
  • 269 Mich. App. 233

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the provision of evidence “for the first time to this Court constitutes an expansion of the record, and a party may not expand the record on appeal”
  • holding that the provision of evidence “for the first time to this Court constitutes an expansion of the record, and a party may not expand the record on appeal”
  • stating that a party may not expand the record on appeal
  • “[A] document that is not notarized is not a ‘valid affidavit.’ ”
  • “[A] document that is not notarized is not a ‘valid affidavit.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoekstra, P.J., and Gage and Wilder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.