Skip to main content

England v. State

Citations

  • 46 So. 3d 127
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15898
  • 2010 WL 4108545

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that order denying motion to suppress “is not dispositive unless the parties so stipulate”
  • holding that where “[i]t [was] unknown whether [the defendant] would have pleaded guilty if his motion to suppress the statements had been granted,” he should be given the option of withdrawing his plea on remand
  • holding that where “[i]t is unknown whether [the defendant] would have pleaded guilty if his motion to suppress the statements had been granted,” he should be given the option of withdrawing his plea on remand
  • finding record “murky” where there were two separate suppression motions and neither the parties nor the court made any differentiation between motions when discussing stipulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morris, Wallace, Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.