Emmanuel v. Handy Technologies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We focus our analysis” on the plaintiff’s “selection of ‘Accept’ on the screen containing the initial sentences of the Agreement on the Handy app on May 14, 2015.”
• screen referred to “Independent Contractor Agreement” and “Service Professional Agreement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Toth v. Everly Well, Inc.
  First Circuit· 2024-09-25· cited 7×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan
  Supreme Court· 1995-05-22· cited 4,743×
• Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna
  Supreme Court· 2006-02-21· cited 1,641×
• Meyer v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2017-08-17· cited 511×
• Gary Sgouros v. TransUnion Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 2016-03-25· cited 150×
• Privitera v. Curran
  First Circuit· 2017-04-20· cited 91×
• Booker, Timothy R. v. Robert Half Intl Inc
  D.C. Circuit· 2005-07-01· cited 65×
• Waithaka v. Amazon.com, Inc.
  First Circuit· 2020-07-17· cited 57×
• Ropes & Gray LLP v. Jalbert (In Re Engage, Inc.)
  First Circuit· 2008-10-06· cited 54×
• Easthampton Savings Bank v. City of Springfield
  First Circuit· 2013-11-22· cited 28×
• Farnsworth, III v. Towboat Nantucket Sound, Inc.
  First Circuit· 2015-06-17· cited 17×
• Realpage, Inc. v. EPS, Inc.
  E.D. Texas· 2007-09-05· cited 14×
• Steinmetz v. Coyle & Caron, Inc.
  First Circuit· 2017-06-29· cited 13×
• Polonsky v. Union Federal Savings & Loan Association
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1956-11-15· cited 10×
• Kilgallen v. Network Solutions, Inc.
  D. Massachusetts· 2000-05-31· cited 5×