Emery v. Sautter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding only permissible sentence is coercive in nature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thompson v. Thompson
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-07-15· cited 139×
• Hunter v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-01-28· cited 14×
• L.R. v. N.H.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2011-03-24· cited 4×
• Branum v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-02-28· cited 3×
• Brandis McCollum (formerly Brandis Adams) v. Indiana Family and Social Services Administration
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-08-31· cited 2×
• In Re GBH
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2011-03-24
• Meleeka Clary-Ghosh v. Michael Ghosh (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-12-05

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Shillitani v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 1,344×
• Pettit v. Pettit
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1993-12-27· cited 85×
• Duemling v. Fort Wayne Community Concerts, Inc.
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1963-03-01· cited 44×
• Marriage of Williamson v. Creamer
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-01-25· cited 32×
• Piercey v. Piercey
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-04-17· cited 27×
• Mosser v. Mosser
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-05-26· cited 19×
• Moore v. Ferguson
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1997-06-04· cited 19×
• Carter v. Johnson
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-02-23· cited 13×