Skip to main content

Emerson v. State

Citations

  • 820 S.W.2d 802
  • 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 275
  • 1991 WL 258862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding undisputed statements by attorneys in support of their positions in Batson hearing constitute valid proof
  • “Because there were no objections made to appellant’s undisputed observations [during the Batson hearing], we hold that [these] observations constitute valid proof in support of appellant’s prima facie case.”
  • four of six black veniremembers struck
  • four of six black veniremembers struck

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.