Emanuel v. David Piercy Plumbing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where medical testimony supports finding that claimant has reached MMI in real time, PTD benefits can be awarded thereafter, even if claimant later became candidate for remedial surgery to restore claimant’s ability to work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg/City of St. Petersburg Risk Management
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-23· cited 19×
• Rivendell of Ft. Walton v. Petway
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-30· cited 12×
• Crum v. Richmond
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-25· cited 12×
• Benniefield v. City of Lakeland
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-04-08· cited 9×
• Florida Transport 1982, Inc. v. Quintana
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-09· cited 5×
• Protegrity Services, Inc. v. Kourtakis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-04

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Holder v. Keller Kitchen Cabinets
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-10-01· cited 14×