Crum v. Richmond

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying disability benefits one day after the expiration of temporary benefits because the disabled worker was still improving and had not yet reached maximum medical improvement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• & SC13-1976 Bradley Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, etc. and City of St. Petersburg, etc. v. Bradley Westphal
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2016-06-09· cited 26×
• Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg/City of St. Petersburg Risk Management
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-23· cited 19×
• Matrix Employee Leasing, Inc. v. Hadley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-11-29· cited 11×
• East v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-14· cited 5×
• Vincent Jones v. Food Lion, Inc. and Risk Management Services
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-11-09· cited 4×
• Flowers v. Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2013-06-25· cited 4×
• SC13-1976 Bradley Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, etc. and City of St. Petersburg, etc. v. Bradley Westphal – Corrected Opinion
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2016-07-07
• Vincent Jones v. Food Lion, Inc. and Risk Management Services
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-11-08

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• City of Pensacola Firefighters v. Oswald
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-15· cited 30×
• Rivendell of Ft. Walton v. Petway
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-30· cited 12×
• Emanuel v. David Piercy Plumbing
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-26· cited 6×
• Olmo v. Rehabcare Starmed/SRS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-31· cited 5×