Skip to main content
· 6/14/1954

Elster v. American Airlines

Citations

  • 106 A.2d 202

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that non-party beneficiaries of stock options were indispensable in an action involving invalidation of the options since the disposition of the case would “seriously affect” the optionees’ rights though the options were allegedly void
  • finding optionees indispensible parties to a suit seeking to cancel options

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.