Brambles USA, Inc. v. Blocker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Indeed, the court had done so, apparently aware at that time that the plaintiffs were potentially residing in the United States illegally. J.A. 272.
• reconsideration may not be used “to argue new facts or issues that inexcusably were not presented to the court in the matter previously decided”
• Indeed, the court had done so, apparently aware at that time that the plaintiffs were potentially residing in the United States illegally. J.A. 272.
• a motion for reconsideration “should not be used as a means to argue new facts or issues that inexcusably were not presented to the court in the matter previously decided”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).