Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 7/31/1989

Ellison v. Shell Oil Co.

Citations

  • 882 F.2d 349
  • 14 OSHC (BNA) 1155
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 11002
  • 1989 WL 83771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to review a district court’s oral reasons for granting a directed verdict when they differed from those in its written order
  • rejecting the argument that the prevailing party’s drafting of the order was relevant.
  • railroad sued by employee under the FELA filed a third-party complaint against another party
  • “Oral responses from the bench may fail to convey the judge’s ultimate evaluation. Subsequent consideration may cause the district judge to modify his or her views.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canby, Trott, Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.