Skip to main content

Ellis v. State

Citations

  • 661 So. 2d 177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court's decision to allow the prosecution to recall a witness in order to admit cocaine into evidence
  • trial judge ruled that defendant's testimony would not come under Rule 404(b), but properly proceeded to conduct a Rule 403 balancing test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dan M. Lee, P.J., and Pittman and Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.