Barnette v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that by failing to renew an objection concerning jury selection appellant did not preserve the issue for appellate review
• “[T]he appellant did not properly preserve this issue for appellate review because he failed to renew his objection and motion for mistrial before the jury was sworn.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).