Skip to main content
· 7/18/1990

Elliott v. Tektronix, Inc.

Citations

  • 796 P.2d 361
  • 102 Or. App. 388
  • 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 686

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing implied duty of good faith and fair dealing claim related to service attendance policy
  • “[A]n at will employer may make unilateral changes in employment terms, notwithstanding its previous representations, and not be subject to contract liability [.]”
  • party can breach duty of good faith without also breaching express provision of contract
  • proof of the existence of a performance evaluation system promised to employee created a question of fact as to whether the policy is a restriction on the right to termination
  • “The jury’s finding that defendants did not breach the contract does not necessarily resolve the implied duty claim, because a party may violate its duty of good faith and fair dealing without also breaching the express provisions of a contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Newman, Deits

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.