Skip to main content

Elliot v. State

Citations

  • 49 So. 3d 269
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12712
  • 2010 WL 3398025

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • an appellate court “reviews the issue of unpreserved fundamental error under the de novo standard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Roberts, Marstiller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.