Elkins v. Syken

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling on discovery, noting that the decision “is in no way intended to favor either plaintiffs or defendants; it is intended to reach a proper balance to protect the rights of both”
• overturning trial court’s enforcement of broad subpoena to experts, noting, “[t]he least burdensome route of discovery ... was simply not followed.”
• affirming this court’s determination that “the [expert] should not be required to disclose the amount of money earned from expert witness work or to disclose his or her total income”
• suggesting three years as a presumptively reasonable period for certain expert disclosures
• \[T]he two cases before us involve pretrial discovery of defense medical experts....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).