Supreme Court of Florida· 4/11/1996
Elkins v. Syken
Citations
- 672 So. 2d 517
- 1996 WL 166506
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling on discovery, noting that the decision “is in no way intended to favor either plaintiffs or defendants; it is intended to reach a proper balance to protect the rights of both”
- overturning trial court’s enforcement of broad subpoena to experts, noting, “[t]he least burdensome route of discovery ... was simply not followed.”
- affirming this court’s determination that “the [expert] should not be required to disclose the amount of money earned from expert witness work or to disclose his or her total income”
- suggesting three years as a presumptively reasonable period for certain expert disclosures
- \[T]he two cases before us involve pretrial discovery of defense medical experts....\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Overton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. BoecherSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-04-22· cited 101×
- Marron v. StromstadAlaska Supreme Court· 2005-11-10· cited 76×
- Cooper v. SchoffstallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-09-07· cited 46×
- In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Civ. Proc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-10-31· cited 39×
- Wrobleski v. De LaraCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-04-16· cited 26×
- Katzman v. Rediron Fabrication, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-12-21· cited 23×
- Morgan, Colling & Gilbert, PA v. PopeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-25· cited 22×
- Heather Worley v. Central Florida Young Men's Christian, etc.Supreme Court of Florida· 2017-04-13· cited 22×
- Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-10-05· cited 22×
- Falik v. HORNAGECourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-04-05· cited 21×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. CurranDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-12-02· cited 21×
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-10-08· cited 20×
- Primm v. IsaacKentucky Supreme Court· 2004-02-19· cited 19×
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. MarottaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-05· cited 18×
- LaFleur v. Shoney's, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court· 2002-05-30· cited 17×
- Sardinas v. LagaresDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-26· cited 14×
- Price v. HannahsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-20· cited 13×
- Flores v. Miami-Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-13· cited 13×
- Ross Dress for Less Virginia, Inc. v. CastroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-03-05· cited 13×
- First Call Ventures, LLC v. Nationwide Relocation Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-11-20· cited 10×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dodson v. PersellSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-11-20· cited 87×
- Surf Drugs, Inc. v. VermetteSupreme Court of Florida· 1970-05-06· cited 60×
- Syken v. ElkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-05· cited 33×
- McAdoo v. OgdenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-13· cited 19×
- Crandall v. MichaudDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-08-05· cited 14×
- Wood v. Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-07· cited 13×
- Young v. SantosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-06· cited 11×
- Bissell Bros., Inc. v. FaresDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-22· cited 7×
- Abdel-Fattah v. TaubDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-28· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.