Crandall v. Michaud

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the predecessor statute to section 456.057(7)(a)(3) barred “furnishing a patient’s medical records or discussing his medical condition” and that the statute “does not seem to make a distinction if the identity of the patient is concealed”
• both describing as \patients\ litigants subjected to independent medical examinations by defendants
• independent medical examiner not required to provide patient reports prepared for defense law firms or insurance agencies over past two years; 1099 tax forms or records of payments from insurers or defense law firms would be easier to locate and more relevant to issue of bias
• independent medical examiner not required to provide patient reports prepared for defense law firms or insurance agencies over past two years; 1099 tax forms or records of payments from insurers or defense law firms would be easier to locate and more relevant to issue of bias

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Elkins v. Syken
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-04-11· cited 89×
• Syken v. Elkins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-05· cited 33×
• LeJeune v. Aikin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-09-21· cited 13×
• Young v. Santos
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-06· cited 11×
• Graham v. Dacheikh
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-08-20· cited 9×
• Pevsner v. Frederick
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-21· cited 8×
• Cooper v. Lewis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-25· cited 7×
• Abdel-Fattah v. Taub
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-28· cited 6×
• Trend South, Inc. v. Antomarchy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-31· cited 4×
• Coopersmith v. Perrine
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-27· cited 4×
• Crowley v. Lamming
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-07-22· cited 3×
• State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Sharp
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-12-14· cited 1×
• Opinion No.
  Arkansas Attorney General Reports· 2001-01-19

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rasmussen v. South Florida Blood Service
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-01-05· cited 122×
• Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Peralta
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-05-02· cited 35×
• Ventimiglia Ex Rel. Ventimiglia v. Moffitt
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-12-17· cited 21×
• No. Miami Gen. Hosp. v. Royal Palm Beach Colony
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-05-12· cited 20×
• McAdoo v. Ogden
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-13· cited 19×
• Fidelity & Cas. Co. of NY v. Lopez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-09-26· cited 19×
• Travelers Indem. Co. v. Salido
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-02-07· cited 10×
• Teperson v. Donato
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-06-05· cited 10×
• Dollar General, Inc. v. DeAngelis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-12-24· cited 8×