Crandall v. Michaud

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the predecessor statute to section 456.057(7)(a)(3) barred “furnishing a patient’s medical records or discussing his medical condition” and that the statute “does not seem to make a distinction if the identity of the patient is concealed”
• both describing as \patients\ litigants subjected to independent medical examinations by defendants
• independent medical examiner not required to provide patient reports prepared for defense law firms or insurance agencies over past two years; 1099 tax forms or records of payments from insurers or defense law firms would be easier to locate and more relevant to issue of bias
• independent medical examiner not required to provide patient reports prepared for defense law firms or insurance agencies over past two years; 1099 tax forms or records of payments from insurers or defense law firms would be easier to locate and more relevant to issue of bias

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).