Elizondo v. Read

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the notice to owner's last known address was constitutionally sufficient in Hollond when Holland made no showing his new address was reasonably ascertainable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Elizondo v. Read
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1992-03-23· cited 34×
• Centrium Group v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
  Indiana Tax Court· 1992-09-17· cited 15×
• Smith v. Breeding
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-02-24· cited 12×
• Yoder v. Elkhart County Auditor
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-04-07· cited 6×
• Elizondo v. Read
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1990-07-18· cited 4×
• Forum Group, Inc. v. McMichael
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1991-07-22· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
  Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
• Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 1,416×
• Schroeder v. City of New York
  Supreme Court· 1962-12-17· cited 569×
• Greene v. Lindsey
  Supreme Court· 1982-05-17· cited 396×
• Holland v. King
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1986-12-02· cited 33×
• Gossett v. Auburn National Bank of Auburn
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1987-10-19· cited 10×
• Miller Reeder Co. v. Farmers State Bank of Wyatt
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1989-10-30· cited 6×
• Reeder & Associates v. Locker
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1989-08-30· cited 3×