Appellate Court of Illinois· 11/5/1985
Eldridge v. Eli Lilly & Co.
Citations
- 485 N.E.2d 551
- 138 Ill. App. 3d 124
- 92 Ill. Dec. 740
- 1985 Ill. App. LEXIS 2661
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A pharmacist owes a duty of ordinary care in practicing his profession, but such care requires the highest degree of prudence, thoughtfulness and diligence, and it is proportioned to the danger involved”
- because “[t]he propriety of a prescription depends not only on the propensities of the drug but also on the patient’s condition” to fulfill such a duty the “pharmacist would have to interject himself into the doctor-patient relationship and practice medicine without a license”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McCullough, Green, Hortelano
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court· 1987-10-05· cited 451×
- Happel v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court· 2002-03-21· cited 162×
- Frye v. Medicare-Glaser Corp.Illinois Supreme Court· 1992-10-22· cited 161×
- McKee v. American Home Products Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1989-11-30· cited 150×
- Dooley v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1990-12-12· cited 106×
- Walker v. Jack Eckerd Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-06-03· cited 55×
- Leesley v. WestAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-01-11· cited 49×
- Morgan v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-08-10· cited 43×
- Fakhouri v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-06-07· cited 39×
- Adkins v. MongMichigan Court of Appeals· 1988-03-02· cited 30×
- Stebbins v. Concord Wrigley Drugs, IncMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-11-02· cited 26×
- Estate of Johnson v. Badger AcquisitionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-04· cited 25×
- Nichols v. Central Merchandise, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1991-09-27· cited 24×
- Walls v. Alpharma USPD, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2004-03-05· cited 23×
- Abrams v. ButeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2016-03-09· cited 18×
- Happel v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-09-29· cited 17×
- KLASCH v. Walgreen Co.Nevada Supreme Court· 2011-11-23· cited 17×
- Oakey v. May Maple Pharmacy, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2017-04-13· cited 17×
- Brooks v. Merck & Co., Inc.S.D. Illinois· 2006-07-31· cited 16×
- Paquin v. TillinghastSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1986-11-06· cited 15×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barthel v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadIllinois Supreme Court· 1978-11-22· cited 116×
- Nancy C. Lindsay and Bruce H. Lindsay v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationSecond Circuit· 1980-12-08· cited 102×
- Mahr v. G. D. Searle & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-03-07· cited 58×
- Jones v. IrvinS.D. Illinois· 1985-02-15· cited 31×
- Pysz v. Henry's Drug StoreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-10· cited 22×
- Talman v. Department of Registration & EducationAppellate Court of Illinois· 1979-11-08· cited 14×
- Jones v. Walgreen Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1932-02-23· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.