Skip to main content
· 11/5/1985

Eldridge v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Citations

  • 485 N.E.2d 551
  • 138 Ill. App. 3d 124
  • 92 Ill. Dec. 740
  • 1985 Ill. App. LEXIS 2661

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A pharmacist owes a duty of ordinary care in practicing his profession, but such care requires the highest degree of prudence, thoughtfulness and diligence, and it is proportioned to the danger involved”
  • because “[t]he propriety of a prescription depends not only on the propensities of the drug but also on the patient’s condition” to fulfill such a duty the “pharmacist would have to interject himself into the doctor-patient relationship and practice medicine without a license”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCullough, Green, Hortelano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.