Adkins v. Mong

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• alleging that pharmacy negligently supplied plaintiff with excessive amounts of prescribed controlled substances for six years
• no duty on part of pharmacist to monitor and intervene in customer’s reliance on drugs prescribed by licensed physician
• A pharmacist owes no duty to warn customer of potential side effects of substance dispensed in accordance with valid prescription or to monitor and intervene with customer's use of medication prescribed by licensed treating physician.
• A pharmacist owes no duty to warn customer of potential side effects of substance dispensed in accordance with valid prescription or to monitor and intervene with customer's use of medication prescribed by licensed treating physician
• A pharmacist owes no duty to warn customer of potential side effects of substance dispensed in accordance with valid prescription or to monitor and intervene with customer’s use of medication prescribed by licensed treating physician
• A pharmacist owes no duty to warn customer of potential side effects of substance dispensed in accordance with valid prescription or to monitor and intervene with customer's use of medication prescribed by licensed treating physician

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).