Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 3/9/1956
Elder v. Elder
Citations
- 120 A.2d 815
- 84 R.I. 13
- 1956 R.I. LEXIS 13
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the trial justice’s removal of the question of testamentary ca pacity from the jury s consideration was appropriate when no contrary evidence was presented
- \[W]here there is no statute to the contrary and where the condition affixed to a testamentary gift violates no established rule of law or public policy\, condition is valid
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flynn, Condon, O'Connell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Haynes v. First Nat'l State Bk. of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-07-22· cited 83×
- Berman v. SitrinSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2010-04-20· cited 55×
- Simeone v. CharronSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2000-12-01· cited 41×
- In Re Review of Proposed Town of New Shoreham ProjectSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2011-07-01· cited 34×
- Gunter v. PogueTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1984-04-26· cited 28×
- Lett v. GiulianoSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2012-01-09· cited 14×
- Machover v. Estate of MachoverSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 1992-10-26· cited 2×
- Frost v. Warren Zoning Board of Appeals, 02-3024 (2003)Superior Court of Rhode Island· 2003-11-28
- In THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM F. McLOUGHLIN.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2024-09-30
- Alicia Andrew v. Richard AdornoSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2026-01-15
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.