Skip to main content
· 12/1/2000

Simeone v. Charron

Citations

  • 762 A.2d 442
  • 2000 R.I. LEXIS 215
  • 2000 WL 1790299

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to broaden statutory provisions by judicial interpretation \unless such interpretation is necessary and appropriate in carrying out the clear intent or defining the terms of the statute\
  • \[T]his Court will not broaden statutory provisions by judicial interpretation unless such interpretation is necessary and appropriate in carrying out the clear intent or defining the terms of the statute.\
  • “[T]his Court will not broaden statutory provisions by judicial interpretation unless such interpretation is necessary and appropriate in carrying out the clear intent or defining the terms of the statute.”
  • \[T]his Court will not broaden statutory provisions by judicial interpretation unless such interpretation is necessary and appropriate in carrying out the clear intent or defining the terms of the statute.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weisberger, Lederberg, Bourcier, Flanders, Goldberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.