Skip to main content

Eiselein v. K-Mart, Inc.

Citations

  • 868 P.2d 893
  • 1994 Wyo. LEXIS 20
  • 1994 WL 31368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]his court has adopted the rule that an owner or occupier of a premises will not be liable for injuries resulting from a slip and fall on a natural accumulation of ice or snow.”
  • “The plain language of the statute cannot be read to impose new duties of care on prospective defendants. Since 20 tool for interpreting earlier statutes, see People v Arnold, 508 Mich 1, 14 n 26; 973 NW2d 36 (2021
  • “The plain language of the statute cannot be read to impose new duties of care on prospective defendants. Since 20 tool for interpreting earlier statutes, see People v Arnold, 508 Mich 1, 14 n 26; 973 NW2d 36 (2021
  • “The plain language of the statute cannot be read to impose new duties of care on prospective defendants. Since 20 tool for interpreting earlier statutes, see People v Arnold, 508 Mich 1, 14 n 26; 973 NW2d 36 (2021
  • “The plain language of the statute cannot be read to impose new duties of care on prospective defendants. Since 20 tool for interpreting earlier statutes, see People v Arnold, 508 Mich 1, 14 n 26; 973 NW2d 36 (2021

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: MacY, Thomas, Cardine, Golden, Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.