Skip to main content
· 11/30/2004

Pinnacle Bank v. Villa

Citations

  • 2004 WY 150
  • 100 P.3d 1287
  • 2004 WL 2709491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a non-party State actor when it acts negligently and fails to use reasonable care can be considered by the jury in its comparative fault analysis
  • under Wyoming apportionment statute, a party or nonparty, “even though immune, can be included in the jury’s comparative fault analysis”
  • under Wyoming apportionment statute, a party or nonparty, “even though immune, can be included in the jury’s comparative fault analysis”
  • under Wyoming apportionment statute, a party or nonparty, “even though immune, can be included in the jury’s comparative fault analysis”
  • “[W]hen a conglomeration of circumstances are relied on in order to find the statutory or regulatory violation, use of the negligence per se doctrine is not desirable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Golden, Lehman, Kite, Voigt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.