Skip to main content
· 3/10/2015

Eidos Display, LLC v. Au Optronics Corporation

Citations

  • 779 F.3d 1360
  • 113 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1975
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 3681
  • 2015 WL 1035284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining, for a patent “directed toward manufacturing processes for an electro-optical device such as liquid crystal display (LCD)[,]” the POSITA as “someone with knowledge of LCD manufacturing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallach, Taranto, Chen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.