EFCO Corp. v. Symons Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding sufficient causation where plaintiffs decline in revenues and defendant’s increase in profits were accompanied by evidence that showed plaintiffs lost clients sought out defendant’s product
• finding a party was not permitted to collect separate damage awards because the party’s damage calculations on its legal theories overlapped
• finding the district court did not err in admitting experts’ conflicting testimonies and leaving the jury to decide which expert’s theory was sounder
• finding the district court did not err in admitting experts’ conflicting testimonies, and leaving the jury to decide which expert’s theory was sounder
• finding the district court did not err in admitting experts’ conflicting testimonies, and leaving the jury to decide which expert’s theory was sounder
• finding sufficient causation where plaintiff's decline in revenues and defendant's increase in profits were accompanied by evidence that showed plaintiff's lost clients sought out defendant's product

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).