EF Hutton & Co., Inc. v. Youngblood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiff was a consumer of investment services for which commission was to be paid even though no commission was ultimately paid or charged
• trial court abused its discretion in allowing an attorney to testify regarding reasonable attorneys’ fees because the attorney had not been designated as an expert
• argument that the DTPA is inapplicable to securities transactions was never presented to the trial court and therefore waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).