Skip to main content

Edwards v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 454 S.E.2d 1
  • 19 Va. App. 568
  • 1995 Va. App. LEXIS 95

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that a court reporter’s transcript is the preferred, but not exclusive means of impeachment
  • finding prejudice in the absence of a proffer because there “was no way appellant could have proffered what a potential cross-examination answer would have been until he laid the initial foundation”
  • finding prejudice in the absence of a proffer because there \was no way appellant could have proffered what a potential cross-examination answer would have been until he laid the initial foundation\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fitzpatrick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.