Craig v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a claim of self-defense is made “the acts must be viewed through the eyes of the person allegedly threatened”
• holding that when a claim of self-defense is made \the acts must be viewed through the eyes of the person allegedly threatened\
• holding that when a claim of self-defense is made “the acts must be viewed through the eyes of the person allegedly threatened”
• holding that when a claim of self-defense is made \the acts must be viewed through the eyes of the person allegedly threatened\
• finding prejudice without a proffer because the nature of the witness’ response was unnecessary for the determination
• finding prejudice without a proffer because the nature of the witness' response was unnecessary for the determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Peeples v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-10-05· cited 37×
• Edwards v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1995-02-07· cited 30×
• Cortez-Hernandez v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2011-04-05· cited 19×
• Kearney v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2001-07-10· cited 10×
• Durant v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2001-05-15· cited 9×
• Peeples v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-09-29· cited 9×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Burford v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1942-06-08· cited 53×