Edwards v. Campbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating statutory interest is simple interest unless the Legislature indicates otherwise
• noting the changes effected by the 2005 amendment to section 34-31-20(B)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• in Re Steven C. Phillips
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2015-01-07
• Bauckman v. McLeod
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-12-11
• Samson Exploration, LLC, F/K/A/ Samson Lone Star, L.P. v. Joe A. Bordages Jr.
  Texas Supreme Court· 2024-06-07
• Samson Exploration, LLC, F/K/A/ Samson Lone Star, L.P. v. Joe A. Bordages Jr.
  Texas Supreme Court· 2024-08-30

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stevenson v. Stevenson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-06-22· cited 116×
• Wooten v. Wooten
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-06-06· cited 102×
• Hainer v. American Medical International, Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-10-14· cited 46×
• Thornton v. Thornton
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-10-13· cited 42×
• Calhoun v. Calhoun
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-06· cited 40×
• Buist v. Huggins
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 25×
• Carolina Savings Bank v. Parrott
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1888-12-07· cited 10×
• Bowen v. Barksdale
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1890-06-21· cited 5×