Buist v. Huggins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that charging a flat rate of interest on redeemed properties was intended where the statute did not specify that the interest be compounded
• noting that a subsequent statutory amendment may be interpreted as clarifying statutory intent
• noting that a subsequent statutory amendment may be interpreted as clarifying statutory intent
• finding the court cannot impose another meaning on plain statutory language
• where a statute’s language is plain, unambiguous, and conveys a clear meaning, the court has no right to impose another meaning
• where a statute's language is plain, unambiguous, and conveys a clear meaning, the court has no right to impose another meaning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).