Edwards-Pickering Co. v. Rodes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that the hearing officer parsed the claimant’s statement, but that the claimant’s full statement.does not appear inconsistent with the treating physician’s opinion
• reliance on the testimony of a vocational expert is proper if that expert is provided with an accurate assessment of the claimant's residual functional capacity
• reliance on the testimony of a vocational expert is proper only if that expert is provided with an accurate assessment of the claimant's residual functional capacity
• explain- tag the Court’s use of the term “hearing officer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).