Skip to main content
· 3/5/1918

Berry v. Trice

Citations

  • 179 Ky. 594
  • 201 S.W. 37
  • 1918 Ky. LEXIS 275

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “diverting staff attention from other activities does not sufficiently satisfy 15 the requirement of hardship or inequity.”
  • finding the motion to intervene to be timely because “the court ha[d] not yet substantively engaged in the issues in the case”
  • prudential mootness inappropriate where Reclamation had not yet finalized or implemented remedies plaintiff sought

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chiep, Settle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.