Skip to main content
· 4/19/2001

Ecorp, Inc. v. Rooksby

Citations

  • 746 N.E.2d 128
  • 2001 Ind. App. LEXIS 672
  • 2001 WL 393013

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a contract is ambiguous when reasonable people could come to differing opinions about its meaning
  • reversing summary judgment where, “[g]iven the technical nature of the term used, reasonable people could arrive at different conclusions about the meaning of ‘recapitalization’ in Rooksby’s employment contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Sharpnack, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.