· 4/23/1979
Wood v. Coastal States Gas Corp.
Citations
- 401 A.2d 932
- 1979 Del. LEXIS 376
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a stock split effects “changes in the number of outstanding shares which are unaccompanied by other balance sheet changes: thus a stock split, reverse split or stock dividend changes only the number of shares outstanding without any change in corporate assets”
- “Because the contract is the measure of plaintiffs’ right, there can be no recovery under an unjust enrichment theory independent of it.”
- “Because the contract is the measure of plaintiffs’ right, there can be no recovery under an unjust enrichment theory independent of it.”
- “Because the contract is the measure of plaintiffs’ right, there can be no recovery under an unjust enrichment theory independent of it.”
- “Because the contract is the measure of [the movant’s] right, there can be no recovery under an unjust enrichment theory independent of it.”
- “[T]he contract is the measure of [Plaintiffs’] right, [and] there can be no recovery under an unjust enrichment theory independent of it.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Duffy, Quillen, Horsey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.