Skip to main content
· 4/23/1979

Wood v. Coastal States Gas Corp.

Citations

  • 401 A.2d 932
  • 1979 Del. LEXIS 376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a stock split effects “changes in the number of outstanding shares which are unaccompanied by other balance sheet changes: thus a stock split, reverse split or stock dividend changes only the number of shares outstanding without any change in corporate assets”
  • “Because the contract is the measure of plaintiffs’ right, there can be no recovery under an unjust enrichment theory independent of it.”
  • “Because the contract is the measure of plaintiffs’ right, there can be no recovery under an unjust enrichment theory independent of it.”
  • “Because the contract is the measure of plaintiffs’ right, there can be no recovery under an unjust enrichment theory independent of it.”
  • “Because the contract is the measure of [the movant’s] right, there can be no recovery under an unjust enrichment theory independent of it.”
  • “[T]he contract is the measure of [Plaintiffs’] right, [and] there can be no recovery under an unjust enrichment theory independent of it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duffy, Quillen, Horsey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.