D.C. Circuit· 6/11/2002
EchoStar Comm Corp v. FCC
Citations
- 292 F.3d 749
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing the FCC to “rely upon the uncontested, sworn affidavit of a witness speaking from personal knowledge”
- rejecting petitioner’s claim that an uncorroborated and untested statement upon which the agency relied cannot constitute substantial evidence where the statement was given under oath, the affiant had personal knowledge of the facts, and the petitioner submitted no contradictory evidence
- “There is no support for [petitioner’s] claim that uncorroborated and untested testimony and hearsay testimony cannot constitute substantial evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lacson v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityD.C. Circuit· 2013-07-30· cited 61×
- Bortell v. Eli Lilly and Co.District of Columbia· 2005-10-20· cited 25×
- Southwest Airlines Co. v. Transportation Security AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 2009-02-03· cited 20×
- Sellmon v. ReillyDistrict of Columbia· 2008-06-20· cited 16×
- New Dynamics Foundation v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2006-04-24· cited 16×
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2004-06-29· cited 14×
- City of South Bend v. Surface Transportation BoardD.C. Circuit· 2009-05-29· cited 14×
- La Botz v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict of Columbia· 2012-09-05· cited 14×
- Reilly v. Secretary of the NavyDistrict of Columbia· 2014-01-29· cited 13×
- United States v. Dynamic Visions, Inc.District of Columbia· 2016-10-24· cited 11×
- Former Employees of Barry Callebaut v. HermanCourt of International Trade· 2002-08-30· cited 7×
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. SilkmanD. Maine· 2017-01-26· cited 3×
- Psak v. JewellDistrict of Columbia· 2020-06-01
- Doe v. LiebermanDistrict of Columbia· 2021-09-30
- Lawrence McNally v. Virginia Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2024-03-26
- Sprint Corporation v. FCCD.C. Circuit· 2025-08-15
- Affirmed Energy, LLC v. FERCD.C. Circuit· 2026-02-10
- Evergreen Shipping Agency (America) Corp. v. FMCD.C. Circuit· 2026-04-28
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 22,864×
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1938-12-05· cited 12,026×
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 8,453×
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court· 1975-02-24· cited 2,871×
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1978-04-03· cited 2,329×
- William G. McBride v. Merrell Dow and Pharmaceuticals, Inc., an Ohio CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1986-09-12· cited 181×
- B. Riley McClelland v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the InteriorD.C. Circuit· 1979-08-17· cited 74×
- Hi-Tech Furnace Systems, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionD.C. Circuit· 2000-08-08· cited 33×
- American Message Centers v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Sprint Communications Company, L.P., IntervenorD.C. Circuit· 1995-06-07· cited 20×
- Sheryl Crawford v. United States Department of AgricultureD.C. Circuit· 1995-03-31· cited 17×
- Green v. ShalalaSeventh Circuit· 1995-03-30· cited 17×
- Echostar Communications Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionD.C. Circuit· 2002-06-11· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.